Recent Tweets
Loading tweets...
My friends call me Tommy. I'm a graphic designer living in Chicago. This is where I post some process images, some finished designs, some music, opinions, and other stuff.
Loading tweets...
wut?
“This is not the typical book that you read whilst sitting calmly and still. In order to read the multiple directions in which the text...
Helping the @chicagodesignmuseum build out their space today.
Black Swan design comp using Volterra type.
http://www.hypefortype.com/browse-fonts/font-categories/decorative/volterra.html
Produce less waste. #UseLessDoMore @movingdesign with @nikolegramm @craigdstover @alyssalowww
Anyone who works in a creative field knows that sometimes having complete creative freedom can make your task much harder. Having some restrictions help shape your task, and give you a problem to solve. Twitter’s 140 character restriction works in the same way. By limiting your space, Twitter forces you to choose your words wisely. However, there are a few likely unforeseen issues that the 140 character limit has caused, and I’d like to propose a solution.
First, the URL issue. The character restriction has created a whole internet cottage industry of URL shorteners. Sites like tinyurl and bit.ly exist almost solely as a way to give the Twitterer a few more characters to work with. What I would propose would be to allow users to create html links. Allow people to highlight a few words of their tweet and turn them into a link.
So a tweet liks this…

Would turn into this…

It’s a small change, but in many cases it would give you an extra 20 characters to work with (Twitter automatically turns any non-shortened URL into an abbreviated 20 character version).
The other issue I have with Twitter is the inconsistency in retweeting. The official Twitter method is to either retweet without comment, showing the original users icon with an indication of who is retweeting it. The other option is to “quote tweet” in which it puts the original tweet (and twitter handle) in quotes with your comment following outside the quotes. The big problem with this is that if the original tweet is longer than 60 characters, once you add in the original twitter handle, you barely have any characters left to comment. Other programs format retweets in the following way: [retweeters comment RT: @originalhandle {original tweet}]. The issue with this is that it forces you to read the follow up comment before the original tweet, and it doesn’t do anything to solve the character count issue. Additionally, this gives the original tweeter a little less credit in your feed because followers of the retweeter don’t see the original user’s icon or full name.
I would propose that Twitter make a consistent retweet style that doesn’t link retweet comments to the original tweet, so you are able to write a full 140 characters, no matter what the length of the original tweet was. Just visually link a retweeted comment to the original tweet. Like this…

This method gives everyone their due exposure and lets users write more than 15 characters when commenting in their retweet.
These aren’t new problems to Twitter, and I doubt nobody on their team has thought of these solutions, so I don’t have high hopes for a change. I have a feeling they like the strange Twitter world they’ve created, with bit.ly and hashtags and RTs, but I think it would really improve the experience.
Lastly, follow me on Twitter: @tqvinn
High-res
Behold, the power of tumblr! I started this tumblr less than 9 months ago, just filling in old posts from my previous blog. My anamorphic typography post caught the eye of someone in charge of the #design tumblr tag and spread around tumblr in a way I never would have imagined. Yesterday, it passed the 40,000 likes/reblogs mark. Thanks to all of you tumblrers!
A few photos from my presentation at the Apple Store in Lincoln Park (in Chicago). It was pretty cool showing my work on their enormous 80 inch television. Thanks to Kris Kettner for taking these photos.

I was born in Two Rivers, Wisconsin, but my family moved to California about 6 months later. Whenever the topic of Two Rivers comes up, it results in a groan from my parents that indicates that it was not necessarily their favorite or the many cities they moved around to over the years. So tonight at dinner, I start telling my parents “Hey, did you happen to know that there is a place in Two Rivers called the Hamilton Type Museum that is a bit of a mecca for type nerds?”. I intended to go on about their wood type collection, thinking that they would be all surprised about this information, but instead I am interrupted with the information that my Dad was THE PRESIDENT of Hamilton Manufacturing Company and that is why we were living in Two Rivers at the time of my birth! Apparently he used to have a whole drawer of wood type as a parting gift, but it is believed to have been lost in subsequent moves. I suppose I was always destined to be a type nerd.
I think it’s about time we start setting some spoiler guidelines. We now live our lives without the constraints of actually needing to watch something “live”, and while I enjoy the ability to watch television shows at my own convenience instead of having to make sure I am settled and in front of the television at exactly 7pm on Thursday, it can be very annoying when you are trying to talk to someone about a show from the previous night and they don’t want to hear about it because they haven’t watched it yet. I understand that people get busy, and that you might not watch something on the night in which it airs, but if you haven’t watched it within a week of it airing, you don’t get to complain about “spoilers”.
Beyond the timing issue, I feel like people have gotten too nitpicky with what constitutes a “spoiler”. Most shows don’t have real spoilers. LOST had spoilers, Breaking Bad has spoilers, reality shows in which someone is eliminated each week have spoilers, but a show like Louie or Parks and Recreation or Community don’t really have real spoilers. Here is the “spoiler” for every episode of every one of those shows: the main characters of the show are presented with an obstacle or problem, and, SPOILER ALERT, they overcome said obstacle and/or problem. Most shows, and most movies even, don’t provide enjoyment through dramatic plot twists, they have a plot as an excuse to enjoy the characters and how they would react to different problems. Even fiction that does depend on some amount of suspense or uncertainty probably has a pretty predictable ending. Take The Dark Knight Rises…SPOILER ALERT: Batman wins in the end. Who would have thought?!?! There isn’t any twist in which it turns out that Alfred was actually the villain all along, it’s just that Bane is a bad guy, he does some bad things, Batman faces some adversity, then overcomes adversity to emerge victorious. What a surprise! I thought Batman would lose in the end!
The enjoyment of almost all fiction is the journey itself and enjoying the events as they unfold, not the uncertainty of how it will all end. There are very few shows or movies that would really be ruined by spoilers. Movies like The Sixth Sense, Fight Club, and The Usual Suspects would be viewed much differently throughout the film if you know the twist ending. These are the movies that would be ruined if you knew what the ending was ahead of time, but these movies are rare. I could say almost anything about The Avengers, and it wouldn’t really ruin the enjoyment of that movie, yet I’m not allowed to say a single word about it all summer because my friend hasn’t seen it yet. Therefore…
I propose the following guidelines:
Television shows: If you haven’t watched a show within 7 days of it’s original airing, you can’t complain about spoilers.
Television shows on DVD: If you didn’t want it spoiled, you should have watched it when it aired. I watched Citizen Kane knowing what “Rosebud” was, Soylent Green and knew it was people, and Planet Of The Apes knowing that they were on Earth. And yet, it was okay.
Movies: Six weeks. If there is a movie that you really want to see, find a way to see it within six weeks, or else risk having it spoiled.
Entertainment is meant to be enjoyed with others, and it is annoying as hell not getting to discuss it just because a couple of your friends haven’t seen something yet. So watch the things you like, and watch them in a timely manner, and we’ll discuss it afterward.
Why is it that whenever poker is shown in movies, it always comes with the implication that the player with the best hand is somehow an amazing poker player? In the above clip from Casino Royale, James Bond comes off a genius because he has a straight flush and defeats multiple full house hands, but in reality he likely would have folded pre-flop. If they really wanted to portray him as an excellent poker player, they would show him scaring another player off the best hand when he had nothing. Scenes like this one are the poker equivalent of saying that people who win the lottery are somehow more skilled at playing the lottery than all other lottery players.
In 2006, I took a photo of myself every day as I grew a beard. Then I had to shave my beard because I got a new job.
High-res
On the eve of The Dark Knight Rises, I thought I’d go ahead a remind everyone that I played a very minor, yet very important, role in The Dark Knight (seen above). Am I the reason it made over a billion dollars? It’s hard to know for sure, but it certainly didn’t hurt.
High-res
If you ever go to The Gun Store in Las Vegas, you’ll be presented with a selection of targets to shoot guns at. They range from your standard abstract-outline-of-a-human to killer clown zombies. The target selection between the clinical and the absurd were kind of fascinating to me. Everyone visiting the store seemed willing to ignore the overt racism in shooting at a backward hatted, overalled black man… apparently satisfying every suburban caucasian’s need to get revenge on the hypothetical black man ready to rob them if they take a wrong turn in the big city. The need to kill Bin Laden is a bit more understandable, though I took my personal revenge on his 2 dimensional paper brother before Seal Team 6 had the chance to.
Aside from all of that, the image below might be my all time favorite image of my wife and I.

Apple has gotten a lot of criticism over it policies on what apps are allowed onto their App Store. While I don’t agree with their reasoning on why certain apps aren’t allowed, they have every right to draw the line somewhere. If not, it would take approximately 24 hours before the App Store would basically just be called the Porn Store. So, where do you draw the line? Apple may draw the line a little more conservatively than most people do.
The apps that people get the most worked up about Apple turning down are almost always something that doesn’t make sense for Apple to carry. They are running a business. I’m guessing it wouldn’t help their bottom line (or more specifically, AT&T’s bottom line) if they allow you to use a Google Voice app that lets you make phone calls for free. While I wish I could use my iPhone to tether my laptop as much as anyone, I think we can all acknowledge that this would suck up a ton more data—data that AT&T has to deliver—and that it makes sense that AT&T requires that you pay an additional fee for that.
Aside from that, while it might seem like censorship, it is actually our freedom that allows us all (businesses included) to choose what we do and don’t want to do. Walmart doesn’t carry certain violent videogames. Blockbuster doesn’t rent pornos. Apple has every right to decide whether they want to be in the business of selling the “Pull My Finger” app or not. Should we be outraged that Apple doesn’t sell Dell computers at Apple Stores? They are allowed to sell whatever they want to sell, and not sell whatever they don’t want to sell. Where is all of the outrage that Android Market doesn’t have an iTunes app?
At risk of sounding right-wing, the truth is that the free market will solve all of this. If there are apps that Apple is turning down that there is a huge demand for, and the Android Market offers it, maybe people will opt for a Droid instead of renewing with AT&T once their contract is up.
For those still not convinced, I suggest you read this article about the Nazi theme that was available on the Android Market. Apparently people want to vilify Apple for censorship, and praise the openness of the Android Market, but when the true face of freedom of speech inevitably shows up people demand censorship. I think we can all agree that we need to draw the line somewhere. If you don’t like where Apple has drawn theirs, then put your money where your mouth is and go buy a Droid.
Hang on tight while we grab the next page